The Ball

Anything that can read/sense information has the ball. It may not have the ball for long but as it picks up information, it has the ball. Dynamically storing information (dynamic in the sense that the information that was once sensed/read is read again at a later data or semi-continuously e.g. memory) allows for persisting of the ball being held.

For example, in the brief moment a single-celled organism with the ability to detect light perceives a photon of light, it holds the ball, as soon as that information/stimuli is gone, it loses the ball; if it has a way of recalling the information, it continues to hold the ball as long as the information is recalled (e.g. The brain converts direct stimuli/information to electrical signals, this way it can continue to recall information to near the exact same way as it was first received; near same information, near same ball)

Another quick thought.

The Bottle of Marbles Analogy

The Bottle of Marbles Analogy:

Assume you have a bottle containing four marbles, marbles A, B, C, and D, which move with Brownian motion (random motion) within the bottle. When marbles A, B and D collide at the same time a glow occurs and the marbles stick together for 24hrs before the glow ends and the marbles separate. Note that the collision of any marble to another leads to the marbles being stuck together for 24hrs.

The Burden of Purpose (A Philosophical Concept)

To start off, I’d like for everyone to distance themselves from their opinions and beliefs before reading this. I say this so most if not everyone can enjoy the opportunity of understanding this short philosophical notion I’ve been thinking about for a while now [and by short I really do mean short, there’s honestly not much to it]. 

With that said... What is "The Burden of Purpose"? I’d let you guys have a guess or two at what the concept is about, comment if you got it vaguely or completely correct👌. 

Before starting off, I think I need to lay the basis for a lot of the premises made within this discussion.

The Assumptions:

• The utmost thinking being(s)’s [Be it humans or gods or a God] existence was not planned.

• If the being is omnipotent [All-powerful], it is not bound to any laws and can override any laws given to its self upon its creation.

• If the being is omniscient [All-knowing], it knows its beginning and, if it has an end, its end.

The Layered World ("Higher" Enlightenment)

Background
So recently, I've had more time and freedom to experience life in a "higher" state of mind. While in these states one thing I hadn't thought about much hit me; the fact that everyone experiences life radically differently or the fact that others may see life as I do in my "higher" states naturally. Experiencing life while in a higher state has been a huge eye-opener, with every encounter leading me to see things much differently (maybe more accurately, maybe more inaccurately, but nevertheless differently) and in turn prompting a slew of new "realizations".

I think I'll begin a new series of thought posts inspired by these "higher" enlightened states of mind.

With that said, I shall be moving on to today's topic... I'll be discussing the most prominent feature of these encounters; The Layered World.

Disproving quantum multiverse theory?

I've written about this before on Yahoo Answers, but didn't like the answer I got there. Hoping for some better luck here. Here's the basic Premise: